Sustainable centralized water reuse in Jakarta (Indonesia)

In spite of efforts to procure sanitation facilities and infrastructure have been intensively carried out by various government institutions, these facilities and infrastructure are often neglected and inappropriate. Further analysis is needed so that appropriate technology can be applied in the society responsibly. In other words, it is necessary to clarify the role of each stakeholder. In this research, Bima City and Manado City were taken as case studies. In this research, a mixed method or mixed method was generally carried out qualitatively in the Stakeholder Analysis (SA) method and quantitative methods in the Social Network Analysis (SNA) method. Stakeholder Analysis was carried out using a focus group discussion (FGD) while the Social Network Analysis was carried out based on a questionnaire filled out by the FGD participants during the FGD event. The results of the study series in Bima City there are 4 influential actors who are also key actors. Meanwhile in Manado City 3 influential actors are identified who are also key actors and an important actor. In general, the cohesiveness (density) of all types of cooperation in the two cities is not good enough, the City of Bima is 7.7% and the City of Manado is 13.4%. To compare the two cities, in general Manado City relatively has a better cooperative relationship between stakeholders than Bima City. The role of the private sector as a key factor in handling slum settlement sanitation can be done by improving the national legal framework (long term strategy). Short-term strategies can be carried out by establishing cooperation according to the stakeholder category obtained through Stakeholder Analysis (power-interest matrix).